Disposed

Smt. Sangita Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Nov 2019CWJC/19914/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposed of a writ petition by the petitioner seeking a direction to issue an appointment letter. The Court directed the CDPO, Patna City, to address the petitioner's grievance regarding non-issuance of appointment within one month and to pass a reasoned order if she refuses engagement.

What did the court decide?

Directed CDPO, Patna City to decide on petitioner's grievance within one month and to pass a reasoned order if applicant is not to be engaged.

Smt. Sangita Kumari Vs The State of Bihar — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19914 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Smt. Sangita Kumari, W/o Ravi Ranjan Kumar, Resident of MohallaNandgola (Pirdamariya), P.O.- Marufganj, P.S.- Malsalami, Patna City, Distt.Patna

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Director, I.C.D.S. (Integrated Child Development Scheme), Bihar, Patna

¶7

The Director, Department of Welfare, Patna Division, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

¶8

¶9

¶10

The Collector, Patna

¶11

The District Programme Officer, Patna

¶12

The C.D.P.O. (Child Development Programme Officer) Smt. Premlata Devi, Project no. 5, Bajrangpuri, Patna City, Patna

¶13

The Block Development Officer, Patna Sadar, Patna

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ram Krishna Prasad Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Prasant Pratap ( GP-2 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH

¶16

ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 13-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶18

It has been stated in the writ application that based on a selection held for the post of Anganwari Sevika of Centre No. 139 in Ward No. 70, Patna City in the district of Patna, the petitioner was selected on 07.08.2015 itself. It is her grievance that till date no appointment letter has been issued in her favour despite the fact that she had been approaching the authorities continuously.

¶19

I do not find any explanation in the writ application

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.19914 of 2019(2) dt.13-11-2019 2/2

¶21

for approaching this Court more than four years after the petitioner was said to have been selected. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ application is disposed of with a direction that let the CDPO, Patna City take a decision on the petitioner’s grievance, as has been noted above, within a period of one month from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order. In case, CDPO is of the view that the petitioner is not to be engaged for any reason, she will have to pass a reasoned order in this regard.

¶22

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

¶23

Rajesh/-

¶24

Smt. Sangita Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Sangita Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Priyanka Kumari, Vs The State of Bihar

Sunita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Bindhyachal Kumar Sinha, Vs The State of Bihar

Anisha Kumari, Vs The State of Bihar

Vinod Kumar Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Aman Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar