Disposed

Mukesh Kumar Chaupal, v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Nov 2019CWJC/19669/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ application sought a direction to the respondents to decide on the petitioner's application for compassionate appointment following the death of his father. The court directed the District Compassionate Appointment Committee to place the petitioner's case before it and decide within three months, leaving the Committee discretion to take appropriate legal decisions.

What did the court decide?

Direction to place the petitioner's case before the District Compassionate Appointment Committee and take a decision within three months.

Mukesh Kumar Chaupal, Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19669 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Mukesh Kumar Chaupal, Son of Late Mannu Das, resident of viollageSheikhpura Dani, P.O. Pindrauch, P.S. Kewati, District- Darbhanga.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Minor Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Engineer-in-Chief, Minor Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

The Superintending Engineer, Minor Irrigation Circle, Darbhanga.

¶13

The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Darbhanga.

¶14

The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Samastipur.

¶15

The District Compassionate Committee, Samastipur through the Chairmancum-District Magistrate, Samastipur.

¶16

The Establishment Deputy Collector, Samastipur, District- Samastipur.

¶17

... ... Respondent/s

¶18

======================================================

¶19

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Man Mohan Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sita Ram Yadav ( GP-16 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH

¶20

ORAL ORDER

¶21

2 07-11-2019

¶22

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the State of Bihar.

¶23

The petitioner’s father was working as Peon in

¶24

Minor Irrigation Division, Samastipur, who is said to have died in harness on 16.07.2012. It is the petitioner’s case that he was minor on the date of death of his father, late Mannu Das. His date of birth is 14.02.2000. He could not, therefore, apply for his compassionate appointment, soon after the death of the sole

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.19669 of 2019(2) dt.07-11-2019 2/3

¶26

bread earner in the family. Once he attained the qualifying age, he applied for his appointment on compassionate ground on 01.03.2018. No final decision has, however, been taken on his application so far. In the aforesaid background, this writ application has been filed seeking appropriate direction to the respondents to consider his case for grant of compassionate appointment.

¶27

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the family of the petitioner is in penury and it seems that because the wife of the deceased employee was not having the requisite qualification, she had also not applied for compassionate appointment, immediately after the death of her husband.

¶28

A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of Respondent Nos. 4 and 6, wherein it has been stated that apparently the application seeking compassionate appointment was not filed within five years as required under the scheme providing for compassionate appointment in case of death of an employee in harness. It has, at the same time, been stated that the concerned Executive Engineer of the Minor Irrigation Division had forwarded the application of the petitioner to the Respondent No.4 informing that earlier a letter dated

¶29

Patna High Court CWJC No.19669 of 2019(2) dt.07-11-2019 3/3

¶30

21.03.2018 sent to him but till date no information in respect of the decision taken in this regard, has been communicated.

¶31

Considering the facts and circumstances, this application is disposed of with a direction that let the petitioner’s case seeking appointment on compassionate ground be placed before the District Compassionate Appointment Committee and a decision be taken thereon within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶32

It will be open for the Committee to take appropriate decision, in accordance with law.

¶33

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

¶34

arun/-

¶35

Mukesh Kumar Chaupal, v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Kumar Chaupal, v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shailendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Priyanka Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Saibeni Badi @ Saibani Badi Vs The State of Bihar

Punam Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Mina Kumari @ Mina Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Suman Kumari, Vs The State of Bihar