Petitioner, a civlian employee, filed a writ regarding his General Provident Fund (GPF). The petitioner submitted that the outstanding GPF amount was already paid, eliminating any grievance. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of without adjudication on merits.
No further relief granted; petition disposed of as no grievance subsisted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19360 of 2019
======================================================
Sanjay Kumar Sinha Son of Late Rameshwar Prasad, Resident of East Lane of Sewadal Road, Daunapur, Chandchaura, P.S. Vishnupad, Gaya-823001
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ram Hriday Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr.Vikash Kumar (Sc11) ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
ORAL ORDER
4 05-11-2019 The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the outstanding amount of GPF has already been paid to the petitioner herein, hence no grievance qua the petitioner herein subsists.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
Tiwary/-
U
Sanjay Kumar Sinha Son of Late Rameshwar Prasad
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Rural Development Dept. Government of Bihar, Patan
The District Magistrate, Gaya
The Block Development Officer, Belaganj, Gaya
Head Clerk, Office of B.D.O. Belaganj, Gaya
Treasury Officer, Gaya
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
