This application was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioners failed to appear or represent themselves at the hearing despite previous orders noting their absence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16832 of 2007
======================================================
... ... Petitioners
Versus
... ... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.(Sc16)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
ORAL ORDER
11 03-01-2019
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Yesterday also, when the matter was called, there was no representation. From the order-sheet, it appears that on 27.11.2017 also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners.
Considering the above, this application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 7 and 9 is
present.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)
Pawan/- U
Tetra Kuer W/o late Ram Bilash Bind and Ramdhari Bind
The State of Bihar
District Magistrate, Kaimur(Bhabhua)
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
