Petitioner moved to withdraw a petition claiming grievance was redressed. Court dismissed the withdrawal application as it became infructuous. No fresh petition recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1163 of 2018
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1826 of 2015
======================================================
Mahanth Dr. Vidyanand Shastri, Son of Late Ayodhya Singh and chela of Late Acharya Ramjeevan Saheb, R/o Mahadev Math, Ward No-1, Rosera, P.S- Rosera, District - Samastipur.
Z... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Suchitra Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Mrs. Silpa Singh – GA-12
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 02-01-2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw this application as according to her, the grievance of the petitioner has since been redressed and this Court’s order has been complied with.
This application stands dismissed as having
become infructuous.
arun/-
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)
U
Mahanth Dr. Vidyanand Shastri
The State of Bihar
Sri R.K. Mahajan
Sri Rajeev Ranjan
Sri Anand Kishore
Anup Kumar Sinha
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
