High Court in a writ application held that an unregistered lease deed cannot be valid for considering offered land under Group-1, dismissing the petitioner's writ application against Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13456 of 2019
======================================================
Babita Jha Wife of Sri Bhavatosh Jha, Resident of Village- Rautara, P.S. Godda Town, District- Godda.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Alok Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Neeraj Kumar Gupta, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
prepared by the petitioner is not a registered lease deed, this Court finds no error in the decision of the Corporation in saying that the land documents submitted by the petitioner is not valid for considering the offered land under Group-1.
The writ application is dismissed.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
vats/ved
U
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Corporation was correct in rejecting the unregistered lease deed as valid for Group-1 land consideration
Whether the writ application challenging the land classification should be allowed
Babita Jha
The Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited
The Chairman- cum - Managing Director, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited
The Regional Head, Patna Retail Regional Office, Hindustan Petroleum corporation Limited
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
