Allowed

Smt. Renu Devi @ Renu Pandey v. a. N. Sharma, Chief Manager And Authorised Officer, Bank Of India and Anr.

Patna HC23 Aug 2019CWJC/13186/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ application, the petitioner, a borrower, sought permission to withdraw the petition to file a statutory appeal before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the writ application with liberty to file a statutory appeal under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act within 30 days before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal.

Smt. Renu Devi @ Renu Pandey Vs a. N. Sharma, Chief… — Banking and Recovery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13186 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Smt. Renu Devi @ Renu Pandey Wife of Hari Shankar Pandey, Mrs. Ware House, Bachhouta, P.S.-Morkahi, District-Khagaria

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

A. N. Sharma, Chief Manager and Authorised Officer, Bank of India (Bhagalpur Zone), Devdoot Complex, Radha Rani Singh Road, Adampur Chowk, Bhagalpur.

¶7

The Branch Manager, Bank Bank of India, Awadh Complex, Mohalla + P.O. + P.S. + District-Khagaria.

¶8

... ... Respondent/s

¶9

======================================================

¶10

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sanjay Singh Thakur, Advocate ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 23-08-2019 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Writ Application with liberty to file statutory appeal under Section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets & Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the “SARFAESI Act 2002”) before the appellate authority within a period of 30 days from today.

¶13

Learned counsel for the Bank has no objection to the petitioner availing here remedy in accordance with law.

¶14

In the given facts and circumstances of the case, the writ application is being disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to seek her remedy in a statutory appeal within the

¶15

Patna High Court CWJC No.13186 of 2017(2) dt.23-08-2019 2/2

¶16

aforesaid period of 30 days from the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal. If such remedy is applied for the Tribunal shall consider the same on it’s own merit and in case a question of limitation arises for consideration the same will be considered keeping in view the time spent by the petitioner before this court in the present writ application.

¶17

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶18

Rajeev/- U

Smt. Renu Devi @ Renu Pandey v. a. N. Sharma, Chief Manager And Authorised Officer, Bank Of India and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Renu Devi @ Renu Pandey v. a. N. Sharma, Chief Manager And Authorised Officer, Bank Of India and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamlesh Kumar Sinha Vs Vijaya Bank Through Its Manager and Ors.

Dr. Jaidip Das Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Anup Kumar Dokania Vs The State Bank Of India and Ors.

Sampati Choudhary Vs the State of Bihar

Manish Kumar Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar

Laxmi Cycle Store Through Its Proprietor Kapildeo Prasad and Ors. Vs The Chief Managing Director C. M. D. Head Office State Bank Of India and Ors.