Disposed

Anup Kumar Dokania v. The State Bank Of India and Ors.

Patna HC22 Aug 2019CWJC/8645/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, willing to pay the certificate amount, sought direction to fix installments for repayment of dues to the bank. The court advised the petitioner to approach the competent bank authority or file an application in recovery proceedings to seek installment payment facilities under bank policy, thereby disposing of the writ application.

What did the court decide?

Writ application disposed; directed to approach bank or file recovery application for installment facility.

Anup Kumar Dokania Vs The State Bank Of India and Ors. — Banking and Recovery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8645 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Anup Kumar Dokania S/o Begraj Dokania, resident of Mohalla- Shree Niketan, Bhatta Bazar, Durga Bari, P.S.- K. Hat Sahayak, Dist- Purnia.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Bank Of India, SARB 2^nd Floor, Patna Main Branch Building, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna-1, through its Branch Manager.

¶7

The Branch Manager, The State Bank of India, SARB 2nd Floor, Patna Main Branch Building, Gandhi Maidan, Patna-1.

¶8

The Registrar, Debts Recovery Tribunal 2nd Floor, A, B and F Wing, Karpuri Thakur Sadan, Ashiana Digha Road, Patna-800025.

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Kaushlendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate Mr. Sunil Kr. Singh, Advocate For the Bank : None. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 22-08-2019

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is willing to pay of the certificate amount in terms of the judgment dated 25.02.2017 passed in O.A. Case No. 671/2016, therefore, he is only looking for few installments to be fixed by this court so that petitioner can pay the entire dues.

¶15

No one appears on behalf of the Bank.

¶16

In the present facts and circumstances of the case, this court is of the opinion that the petitioner may approach the competent authority of the Bank or file an appropriate application in the recovery proceeding as the case may be with a prayer to allow him to pay all the dues in few installments

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.8645 of 2017(2) dt.22-08-2019 2/2

¶18

which will be considered by the Bank or Recovery Officer as the case may be in accordance with the recovery policy of the Bank and in accordance with law.

¶19

The Writ Application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶20

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶21

Rajeev/-

¶22

Anup Kumar Dokania v. The State Bank Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anup Kumar Dokania v. The State Bank Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The United India Insurance Company Limited, Through Its Divisional Manager Vs Rinki Devi and Or

M/s Arun Construction Co. Vs The State of Bihar

Piyush Kumar Vs The Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation

Kamlesh Kumar Sinha Vs Vijaya Bank Through Its Manager and Ors.

Dr. Jaidip Das Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Shankar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.