Application under writ jurisdiction permitted to be withdrawn as infructuous. The impugned order remained in force but the proceedings were dismissed due to withdrawal by the petitioner.
Permission accorded to withdraw the application as it has become infructuous; matter dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12331 of 2019
======================================================
Bhola @ Nitesh Kumar Son of Murat Lal Singh resident of VillageChandaura, P.S. Punpun, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Harish Kumar, Adv For the State : Mr.Prashant Pratap (GP2)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
Learned Counsel for the petitioner Mr. Harish
Kumar seeks permission to withdraw this application as the same has become infructuous.
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran/-
U
Bhola @ Nitesh Kumar
The Chief Election Commissioner India
The State of Bihar
The Chief Electoral Officer, Bihar
The Returning Officer, Patna
The Jail Superintendent, Adarsh Central Jail Beur
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
