Disposed

Jainarayan Rai v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC14 May 2019CWJC/11947/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court held that discriminatory action in removing encroachment over public land violates Article 14. As allegations were undisputed, the Court directed the Circle Officer to register cases against all encroachers, issue notices, hear all parties, and pass removal orders within six months.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent Circle Officer to register case against all encroachers, issue notices, and complete removal exercise within six months.

Jainarayan Rai Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Land Acquisition | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11947 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Jainarayan Rai Son of Janak Rai, Resident of Village- Kanunia, P.O.Gamhariya Khurd, P.S.- Adapur, District- East Champaran.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar

¶7

The District Collector, Motihari East Champaran.

¶8

The Sub Divisional Officer S.D.O. Raxaul, East Champaran.

¶9

The Circle Officer, Adapur, East Champaran.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha , SC-19 Mr. Birendra Pd. Singh, Advocate ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

4 14-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶14

State.

¶15

The petitioner is aggrieved by arbitrary and discriminatory action of the respondents in taking action for removal of encroachment over the public land.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner was picked up by the Circle Officer, Adapur, East Champaran and in encroachment proceeding the respondent-Circle Officer passed the order for removal of encroachment, whereas similarly circumstanced others have been favoured by the Circle Officer and no proceeding was drawn against those similarly circumstanced like the petitioner.

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.11947 of 2017(4) dt.14-05-2019 2/3

¶18

The petitioner has grievance only against the discriminatory action of the respondents. The respondents were granted time to file counter affidavit but no counter affidavit has been filed.

¶19

Under the aforesaid circumstances, the Court is of the view that encroachment is encroachment and in the matter of removal of encroachment the State authorities cannot adopt pick and choose method which is per se violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Since the allegation of the petitioner as to discrimination in the matter of removal of encroachment has not been disputed by the respondents by way of filing counter affidavit, the Court is constrained to direct the respondent-Circle Officer, Adapur, East Champaran, to register a case of encroachment against all encroachers over the public land and shall take steps for removal of the encroachment.

¶20

In the peculiar facts of the case, the Court grants indulgence to the petitioner to file appropriate application for removal of encroachment before the Circle Officer, Adapur, East Champaran indicating therein the details of the encroachers, who have made encroachment over the public land and thereafter the Circle Officer shall issue notice to all concerned, who have encroached over the public land and after

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.11947 of 2017(4) dt.14-05-2019 3/3

¶22

hearing them as well as the petitioner, the Circle Officer shall pass order for removal of the encroachment. The entire exercise in this regard must be completed by the Circle Officer, Adapur, East Champaran within a maximum period of six months from the date of filing of the application along with a copy of this order.

¶23

With the aforesaid, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶24

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶25

spandey/-

¶26

Jainarayan Rai v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jainarayan Rai v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rustum Ali Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sohagwati Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Govind Mahamarik and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shyam Nandan Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dev Kumar Sah Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Manoj Kumar Vs The Union of India