The High Court at Patna allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ application and consequently dismissed it as withdrawn. Permission was accorded to approach the appropriate authority for redressal.
Permission to withdraw the writ application was accorded, and the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17286 of 2016
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta For the Respondent/s : Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha-Sc19 For the State of Jharkhand : Mr. Nishi Nath Jha
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
3 13-05-2019 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission
to withdraw the writ application in order to approach the
appropriate authority for redressal of their grievance.
Permission is accorded.
The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
Ravi/- U
Govind Mahamarik and others
The State Of Bihar and others
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
