Disposed

Ravindra Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC18 Feb 2019CWJC/11626/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the Sub-Divisional Officer to take a final decision on the rival claims between the petitioner and a private respondent regarding the selection for Gram Kachahari Secretary, based on an existing inquiry report.

What did the court decide?

Respondent no.3 directed to take a final decision on rival claims within four weeks, appearing with parties on 30th March, 2019.

Ravindra Manjhi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11626 of 2014

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ravindra Manjhi S/o Late Hira Manjhi Resident of Marichahwa, P.O. Madhubani, P.S. Dhanha, District - West Champaran ... ... Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State Of Bihar through its Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

¶6

The District Magistrate/Collector, West Champaran at Bettiah.

¶7

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Bagaha, West Champaran at Bettiah.

¶8

The Block Development Officer, Madhubani, West Champaran at Bettiah.

¶9

The Sarpanch, Gram Kachahari, Madhua, Police Station - Dhanaha, District - West Champaran.

¶10

Lalan Ram Son of Late Gharbharan Ram Resident of Village - Madhua, P.S. Dhanha, District - West Champaran at Bettiah ... Respondents

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner : Mr. Shambhu Sharan Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Akash Chaturvedi, AC to SC 11 for the Private respondent : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 18-02-2019

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and private respondent no.6.

¶17

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the enquiry report submitted by the Block Development Officer, Madhubani, West Champaran (respondent no.4) dated 10.10.2011 affirming appointment of respondent no. 6 is not in accordance with law. Petitioner’s candidature was found to be worthy of selection for Gram Kachahari Sechiv. Report was submitted to the Sub Divisional Officer, Bagha, West Champaran (respondent no.3) in 2011. However, till date the issue has not been resolved by respondent no.3.

¶18

In view of the limited controversy, this Court would

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.11626 of 2014(2) dt.18-02-2019 2/2

¶20

direct respondent no.3 to take a final decision in the matter regarding the rival claims between the petitioner and respondent no.6 having regard to the report of the B.D.O., Madhubani (respondent no.4 ) dated 10.10.2011 and any other relevant facts which may be produced by the rival parties.

¶21

Since respondent no.6 has appeared in the instant proceeding, this Court would record that the parties will appear before respondent no.3 on 30^th March, 2019 so as to facilitate final decision on the rival claims of the parties by respondent no.3.

¶22

Let the decision be taken by a reasoned and speaking order and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks thereafter.

¶23

Writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions.

¶24

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶25

Shashi

¶26

Ravindra Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravindra Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Prasad Malakar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bishnu Deo Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Alakh Niranjan Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ravindra Chaudhary and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nand Kumar Thakur and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Hafiz Md. Nadeem Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.