The Division Bench of the High Court of Patna dismissed this writ petition regarding appointment to the post of Amin, holding that earlier orders rendering the same issue open for the State to make requisitions nullified the instant petition.
none
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 5093 of 2014
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr Dhananjai Kumar, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr Prashant Pratap, GP II with Mr Gyan Shankar, AC to GP II For the B P S C : Dr Ratan Kumar, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 15-02-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the respondent-State.
2 In view of the order passed by a Division Bench of this Court in LPA No 388 of 2014 wherein this Court has left it
open for the State Government to send requisition for appointment to the Commission to fill up the post and the conditions of eligibility for appointment of Amin in accordance with law, nothing would survive in the instant writ petition.
3 It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the State that other writ petition bearing CWJC No 5023 of 2014 wherein the same Advertisement No 01010114 published under Notification No 604 (4)/Patna dated 13.12.2013 was assailed by the petitioner has also been dismissed in view of the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in LPA No 388 of 2014 .
4 The other writ petitions also claiming the same relief, in the proceedings arising out of CWJC No 5346 of 2014 and CWJC No 5373 of 2014, have also been dismissed in view of the issue having been decided in LPA No 388 of 2014 .
5 In view of the aforesaid developments, subsequent to filing of the writ petition, fate of the instant writ petition has also to be the same.
6 The instant writ petition is also dismissed in light of the order passed in LPA No 388 of 2014.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
M.E.H. /-
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | NA |
| Uploading Date | 18.02.2019 |
| Transmission Date | NA |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the instant writ petition should be decided independently or in light of the previous order in LPA No 388 of 2014.
Alakh Niranjan Kumar and others
The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue & Land Reforms, Government of Bihar
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
