Oral order dismissing a writ petition challenging denial of compassionate appointment to dependents of work charge employees. The court upheld the decision that such dependents are not entitled to appointment.
Writ petition dismissed with liberty to challenge the order in appropriate proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11582 of 2014
======================================================
... ... Petitioners
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vijay Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rewti Kant Suman, AC to SC 11 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
2 21-01-2019 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the
learned Counsel for the respondent State.
Father of the petitioners were engaged on daily wages on 1.10.1981 and1.4.1981 respectively as Gardener. It is the case of the parties that from, 16.6.1986 they were placed in the work charge establishment and during status as work charge employee they passed away on 12.1.2002 and 11.2.2011 respectively. Petitioners’ claim for compassionate appointment has been considered by the authorities and a decision dated 21.7.2014 has been taken based on Finance Department Resolution No. 10710 dated 17.10.2013. In terms of Clause 4 of the said resolution the petitioners are not entitled to the
Patna High Court CWJC No.11582 of 2014(2) dt.21-01-2019 2/2
benefit of compassionate appointment as dependents of the employee of work charge establishment are not entitled to compassionate appointment in government services.
Counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty to assail said order dated 21.07.2014 in a fresh proceeding.
The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the same in appropriate proceeding.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
SNkumar/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to compassionate appointment.
Sanjeev Kumar
Ranjan Kumar
The State Of Bihar
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
