Disposed

Nilima Sinha Formerly Child Development Project Officer v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC18 Jan 2019CWJC/1173/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a writ petition challenging the dismissal of a petitioner from service. The court directed the petitioner to file a review or memorial under Rule 24(2) of the Bihar CCA Rules 2005 before the competent authority.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file review under Rule 24(2) Bihar CCA Rules 2005 within four weeks.

Nilima Sinha Formerly Child Development Project Officer… — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1173 of 2015

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Nilima Sinha Formerly Child Development Project Officer Tillothu, P.STillothu, Distt.-Rohtas

¶4

... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar 2. The Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna 3. Cabinet Secretary cum Commissioner, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat,Patna 4. Secretary cum Commissioner, to the Department of Social Welfare Bihar,Old Secretariat, Patna

¶7

Joint Secretary to the Govt. Department of Social Welfare, Govt. of Bihar.

¶8

... ... Respondents

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Keshav Kumar Sinha For the Respondents : Mr. Birju Prasad, GP 13 with M/s Amresh, K.M.Prasad, Ajit Anand and Sweta Anand, All AC to GP 13

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 18-01-2019

¶12

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the respondent State.

¶13

It is submitted by the petitioner’s Counsel that the findings in the proceedings have been arrived at without examining the 14 Anganwari Sevikas in presence of the petitioner or her Advocate who was appearing in the proceeding. It is submitted that the statements given by 14 Anganwari Sevikas against the petitioner were also not made available during the proceedings and, as such, the order of punishment dated 27.4.2012 whereby the petitioner has been dismissed from service in

¶14

Patna High Court CWJC No.1173 of 2015 dt.18-01-2019 2/3

¶15

purported exercise of power under Rule 14(11) of the Bihar CCA Rules 2005 is in sustainable in law.

¶16

Learned Counsel for the respondent State submits that the petitioner has adequate remedy and that the issue whether opportunity was granted in course of enquiry to cross-examine the 14 Anganwari Sevikas, and/or whether the statements allegedly submitted by them against the petitioner were made available to the petitioner or not, can well be seen by the authorities exercising the power of review under Rule 24(2) of the Bihar CCA Rules 2005.

¶17

Counsel for the petitioner submits that apart from that there are other infirmities also which he would like to point out before the authority who will be exercising the power of review under Rule 24(2) of the aforesaid provision.

¶18

Having considered the submission of the parties the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to raise his objections before the Competent Authority under Rule 24(2) of the Bihar CCA Rules 2005 by filing review and/or in the form of memorial before the Competent Authority.

¶19

In the event such a review is filed within four weeks from today, the same shall be considered and final order thereupon

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.1173 of 2015 dt.18-01-2019 3/3

¶21

be passed in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of three months thereafter.

¶22

The writ petition stands disposed of.

¶23

(Madhuresh Prasad, J.)

¶24

SNkumar/-

¶25

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	N/A
Uploading Date	21.01.2019
Transmission Date	N/A

Nilima Sinha Formerly Child Development Project Officer v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nilima Sinha Formerly Child Development Project Officer v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Perwezullah Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Gangeshwar Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dhananjai Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Arun Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mahmood Alam Vs The Uttar Bihar Kshetriya Gramin Bank and Ors.

Kundan Kumar Vs The Union Of India and Ors.