This oral order dismisses a writ application challenging decisions related to education posts, holding that no merit exists in view of a prior discussion in a connected case number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10814 of 2016
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kinkar Kumar- Sc27 For the BEPC : Mr. Girijesh Kumar, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
uday/-
U
Nitu Kumari
Soni Kumari
The State Of Bihar
The Director, State Project Bihar
The District Magistrate-Cum-Chairman, Bihar Education Project Nalanda
The District Programme Officer Sarva Siksha Abhiyan, District - Nalanda
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
