Petitioner argued that the writ petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. The court accepted this submission and disposed of the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10204 of 2019
======================================================
Arvind Thakur Son of Dineshwar Thakur, Resident of Village-Panapur, Langa P.S. Sadar Hazipur, District-Vaishali
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ramashish, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Kumar Manish, SC5
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN)
Mr. Ramashish, learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that the matter has been rendered infructuous by passage of time and is disposed of accordingly.
(Jyoti Saran, J)
( Partha Sarthy, J)
Bibhash/-
U
Arvind Thakur
State of Bihar
District Magistrate, Patna
Superintendent of Police, Patna
Officer-in-Charge, Police Station Agamkuan
Jyoti Saran
Partha Sarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
