Allowed

Shyambabu Rai @ Shyambabu Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Apr 2019CR. MISC./9359/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving alleged recovery of cough syrup containing codeine. The petitioner, facing charges under multiple IPC, Drugs and Cosmetics, and NDPS acts, was ordered released on bail bonds with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Shyambabu Rai @ Shyambabu Prasad Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9359 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-207 Year-2018 Thana- SONBERSA District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Shyambabu Rai @ Shyambabu Prasad S/o Late Ram Bilas Rai villageJankinagar, P.S-Sonbarsa, Distt.-Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sri Krishna Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 24-04-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 336, 418 of the Indian Penal Code, 18A, 18B, 28, 28A, 36 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and 8 and 22(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

¶15

The prosecution case in short is that several bottles of cough syrup containing codeine were recovered in this case.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 15.11.2018 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the present case. There is alleged recovery of cough syrup containing codeine in this case. The same does not

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9359 of 2019(3) dt.24-04-2019 2/2

¶18

come under the purview of the N.D.P.S. Act. The petitioner has been made accused due to mistake of fact.

¶19

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R..

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1^st Additional Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi in connection with Sonbarsa P.S. Case No. 207 of 2018.

¶21

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶22

Pankaj/-

Shyambabu Rai @ Shyambabu Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shyambabu Rai @ Shyambabu Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bharosh Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Manish Kumar Yadav @ Manish Kr. Yadav @ Munna @ Manish Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Rohit Kumar Singh @ Bholu Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Garjan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Bachan Mushar and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar

Chhotan Pandey @ Mukesh Pandey Vs the State of Bihar