Single judge order granting bail to petitioner in case involving offences under sections 341, 379, 307, 504, 506, 120(B) of IPC and section 27 of Arms Act. Bail directed upon completion of nine months in custody by furnishing bonds with two sureties.
Bail granted on the completion of nine months in custody by furnishing sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16756 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-197 Year-2017 Thana- SANGRAMPUR District- East
Champaran
======================================================
CHHOTAN PANDEY @ MUKESH PANDEY Son of Prtabhu Pandey Resident of Village and P.S.- Sangrampur, District- East Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shyam Bihari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 24-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 379, 307, 504, 506, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.
The prosecution case in short is that while the informant along with her husband was coming, accused persons surrounded them and opened fire which caused injury to husband of the informant.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 19.9.2018 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16756 of 2019(3) dt.24-04-2019 2/2
submitted in the present case. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no substantive evidence to suggest his implication in the present case. The allegation of firing made by the petitioner is denied. It is further submitted that the petitioner may be released after completion of nine months in custody.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R..
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, on completion of nine months in custody , it is directed that the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. XIV, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 197/2017.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
Pankaj/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for bail on completion of nine months in custody.
7 provisions across 2 enactments
Chhotan Pandey @ Mukesh Pandey
The State of Bihar
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
