Allowed

Ratnesh Singh v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Feb 2019CR. MISC./9141/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed bail to the petitioner in an excise case instituted for possession of Nepali liquor. The court directed furnishing of a bond with sureties, requiring them to be close relatives, and ordered an affidavit undertaking future compliance.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed on bond of Rs. 10,000 with two close relatives as sureties; undertaking to file affidavit against future violations.

Ratnesh Singh Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.9141 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-747 Year-2018 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RATNESH SINGH S/o Ramjatan Singh R/o Village- Sekhauna, P.S- Fenhara, Distt. East Champaran.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 19-02-2019

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶10

State.

¶11

The petitioner seeks bail in Excise Case No. 747 of 2018, instituted for the offence under Section(s) 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶12

It is alleged in the written report that 81 liters of Nepali liquor has been recovered from possession of the petitioner.

¶13

Petitioner is in custody since 28.12.2018.

¶14

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9141 of 2019(2) dt.19-02-2019 2/2

¶16

like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, East Chamapran, Motihari, in connection with Excise Case No. 747 of 2018, subject to the condition that both the bailors will be the close relatives of the petitioner.

¶17

It is mentioned in paragraph-3 of the bail petition that one Excise case of Dhaka P.S. Case No. 195 of 2018 is pending against the petitioner. Petitioner will file affidavit at the time of furnishing bail bonds that he will not indulge in such type of activity in future, failing which, the bail bonds of the petitioner in the instant case will liable to be cancelled.

¶18

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶19

S.Ali/-

¶20

U T

Ratnesh Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ratnesh Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmendra Kumar Nishad @ Dharmendra Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Ajit Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Dipu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Ram Singh @ Rama Singh @ Nanha @ Nanha Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Kaiyum @ Md. Kaiyum Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Kuraish Vs The State of Bihar