Allowed

Bharat Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 May 2019CR. MISC./9132/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an unreported criminal miscellaneous petition for bail arising from a kidnapping case, the High Court granted bail to the petitioner upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties identical to that amount to the Sub-Judge-VI-cum-ACJM.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Judge-VI-cum-ACJM-Iv Begusarai.

Bharat Paswan Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9132 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2018 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

BHARAT PASWAN S/o Vishundev Paswan village-Ward No.15, Bhith, P.SBhagwanpur, District- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Chandra Sen Prasad Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 03-05-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 363 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The prosecution case in short is that the accused persons forcibly kidnapped the newly born child of the informant.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 18.11.2018 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the present case. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9132 of 2019(3) dt.03-05-2019 2/2

¶18

confession of co-accused. Except for confession, there is no substantive evidence to suggest his implication in the present case. The victim child has been recovered from the possession of the Lovely Kumari.

¶19

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Judge-VI-cum- ACJM-Ivth Begusarai in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 181/2018, G.R. No. 3799/18.

¶21

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶22

Pankaj/-

¶23

U T

Bharat Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bharat Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baban Rajak Vs The State Of Bihar

Vivek Sahni @ Attu Sahni @ Vivek Sahani @ Attu Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Bam Shankar Singh @ Gyan Shankar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Naiyar Nehal Anjum Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Asfaque @ Asfaque Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Kumar Vs The State of Bihar