Allowed

Arun Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 May 2019CR. MISC./16766/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted bail to the petitioner, releasing him after one year of custody, through bond and two sureties, in an allegation of kidnapping for ransom involving the Indian Penal Code.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail after completion of one year in custody from 4.9.2018 upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount.

Arun Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16766 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-542 Year-2018 Thana- KISHANGANJ District- Kishanganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Arun Kumar Son of Vishnudeo Rai Resident of Village - Baholi, P.S. - Zadia, District- Supaul.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Radha Mohan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Murli Dhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 03-05-2019

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 363, 364(A), 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Allegation is that some unknown persons kidnapped elder son of the informant for ransom.

¶14

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 4.9.2018 and has got no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in the present case. While the victim was recovered from the possession of co-accused Manju

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16766 of 2019(3) dt.03-05-2019 2/2

¶16

Devi, the petitioner was also present at that time. It is further submitted that the petitioner may be released after completion of one year in custody from 4.9.2018.

¶17

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail after completion of one year in custody from 4.9.2018 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge III, Kishanganj in connection with Kishanganj P.S. case No.542 of 2018.

¶19

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶20

Narendra/-

¶21

U T

Arun Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arun Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baban Rajak Vs The State Of Bihar

Vivek Sahni @ Attu Sahni @ Vivek Sahani @ Attu Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Bam Shankar Singh @ Gyan Shankar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Naiyar Nehal Anjum Vs The State of Bihar

Bharat Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Asfaque @ Asfaque Vs The State of Bihar