Petitioner challenged an order taking cognizance of crimes. The High Court found a prima facie case based on the FIR and refused to interfere, directing the petitioner to raise points at charge framing stage before dismissing the petition.
Petition dismissed; liberty to raise points at charge framing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8618 of 2015
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2008 Thana- NALANDA District- Nalanda
======================================================
Satyendra Kumar son of Late Hiraman Mahto Resident of Village Mainpura Danapur, Cantt. P.S .Danapur, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Lallan Kumar APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 10-05-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP
for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8618 of 2015 dt.10-05-2019 2/2
raise all points appropriately at the time of framing of charges.
4.The petition accordingly stands dismissed.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran/-
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | NA |
| Uploading Date | 13.05.2019 |
| Transmission Date | 13.05.2019 |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order taking cognizance of offences should be quashed at this stage?
Satyendra Kumar
State of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
