Allowed

Siraj Ahmed @ SiRAJ Ahmad @ Sonu v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC10 May 2019CR. MISC./30107/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed an anticipatory bail petition. The court released the petitioners on bail upon furnishing a bond and sureties under Section 438 Cr.P.C., subject to conditions regarding investigation participation and court attendance.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Siraj Ahmed @ SiRAJ Ahmad @ Sonu Vs the State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30107 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2019 Thana- BARHARIA District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SIRAJ AHMED @ SIRAJ AHMAD @ SONU Son of Hassan Imam Resident of Village- Chhaka Tola, P.S- Barharia, District- Siwan.

¶5

Sahzan @ Sahzan Imam @ Belal, Son of Hassan Imam Resident of VillageChhaka Tola, P.S-Barharia, District-Siwan.

¶6

Danis Imam Son of Hassan Imam Resident of Village-Chhaka Tola, P.SBarharia, District-Siwan.

¶7

Amir Ali @ Zamu @ Jummu, Son of Reyaj Ahmad Resident of VillageChhaka Tola, P.S- Barharia, District-Siwan.

¶8

Safi Ahmed @ Chunna Son of Semmiullah Resident of Village-Chhaka Tola, P.S-Barharia, District-Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mukesh Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 10-05-2019

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

¶17

The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148,149, 307,504, 506 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act registered in connection with Barharia P.S. Case No. 67/2019.

¶18

It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of admittedpolitical rivalry. The thrust of accusation of firing is on co-accused Sufian Ahmed and not against the present petitioners. There is no injury report on record to support the prosecution story.

¶19

Learned APP assisted by learned counsel for the informant appearing suo motu opposes the anticipatory bail petition.

¶20

Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners arrest or

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30107 of 2019(2) dt.10-05-2019 2/2

¶22

surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Siwan, in connection with Barharia P.S. Case No. 67/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

¶23

i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners.

¶24

ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶25

iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶26

iv. The petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶27

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶28

Chandran/-

¶29

U T

Siraj Ahmed @ SiRAJ Ahmad @ Sonu v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Siraj Ahmed @ SiRAJ Ahmad @ Sonu v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunaina Devi Vs Amir Suhani, The Deputy Secretary Home special Department, Government Of Bihar Patna and Ors.

Purendra Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Satendra Kumar Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Sunita Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Ajay Thakur @ Ajey Thakur @ Ajay Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar