Allowed

Chunnu Chaudhary v. The state of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC10 Jul 2019CR. MISC./80808/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to Chunnu Chaudhary in a Section 498A matter. Granted subject to a bond of Rs.25,000 and specific conditions, noting the opposite party's failure to appear despite service of notice.

What did the court decide?

Granted anticipatory bail with a bond of Rs.25,000 and two sureties; one surety must be a local person with immovable property; surrender within six weeks.

Chunnu Chaudhary Vs The state of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80808 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1386 Year-2017 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Chunnu Chaudhary, son of Bhola Choudhary, resident of Village – Baradih, P.S. Mofassil, District Gaya

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The state of Bihar

¶8

Pinki Devi, daughter of Karu Chaudhary, wife of Chunnu Chaudhary, resident of village Baradih, P.S. Mofassil, District Gaya

¶9

... ... Opposite Partie

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manish Kumar No2 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Braj Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

6 10-07-2019

¶12

Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in

¶13

connection with Complaint Case No. 1386 of 2017 in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Prosecution story as per complaint petition is that petitioner and other accused persons demanded Rs.1 lac from the complainant and on denial they tortured and threatened her and ultimately ousted her from the house.

¶15

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the whole allegation is false and concocted and he is still ready to keep her with dignity and care but she is not ready to reside with the petitioner.

¶16

Heard learned APP also.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80808 of 2018(6) dt.10-07-2019 2/2

¶18

In this case notice was issued to opposite party No.2 and it appears from office note that she received the notice personally but on the last date none had appeared on behalf of opposite party No.2 or any Vakalatnama has been filed and this case was directed to be posted today and today also none has appeared on behalf of opposite party No.2.

¶19

In view of above facts and circumstances, let petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the receipt of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/(Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Miss. Amrita Singh, Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Gaya, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1386 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

¶20

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶21

spal/-

¶22

U T

Chunnu Chaudhary v. The state of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chunnu Chaudhary v. The state of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamla Kumari Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Tapsir Alam @ Tapsir @ Jasbin Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Sujkala Devi @ Suryakala Devi and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Nayeem Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Bipin Mukhiya Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.