Disposed

Tapsir Alam @ Tapsir @ Jasbin Alam v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Jul 2019CR. MISC./729/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Section 498A IPC case, the Court directed the husband-petitioner to surrender and deposit Rs. 1 lakh towards a matrimonial dispute. Upon compliance with a bail bond, he was to be released. The Court also directed withdrawal of cross-files as the dispute was settled.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to surrender and deposit Rs. 1 lakh; upon deposit and executing Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties, petitioner to be released on bail. Parties directed to withdraw cross-filings.

Tapsir Alam @ Tapsir @ Jasbin Alam Vs The State of Bihar — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.729 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Purnia

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Tapsir Alam @ Tapsir @ Jasbin Alam Abdul Hakim Resident of VillageAliNagar, P.S.- K. Nagar, District-Purnea

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sri Arun Kumar Singh

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

8 09-07-2019

¶13

Case is under Section 498(A0 of the IPC. Petitioner happens to be husband and on appearance of O.P.no.2 the matter was referred to the Patna High Court Mediation and Reconciliation Centre, however, the report submitted by the Mediator disclose that the dispute can not be resolved through the process of mediation.

¶14

It appears that at the time of marriage, the petitioner had taken Rs.01 lac and now he is ready to pay the same.

¶15

Heard learned APP and the learned counsel for the O.P.no.2 also, who has no objection to such proposal.

¶16

In view of the above facts and circumstances let the petitioner surrender before the learned court below by 14.8.2019 with a bank draft of Rs.01 lac in favour of O.P.no.2 and once the same is deposited the petitioner shall be released on bail on

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.729 of 2019(8) dt.09-07-2019 2/2

¶18

bail bonod of Rs.25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Purnea in connection with Mahila P.S.Case No.28 of 2018, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶19

It is needless to say that the amount so deposited shall be released in favour of O.P.no.2 on filing an application by her. Since the matter appears to have been settled between the parties, both parties may take steps for withdrawal of the cases filed against each other.

¶20

With the aforesaid direction, this application is disposed

¶21

of.

¶22

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶23

chn/-

¶24

Tapsir Alam @ Tapsir @ Jasbin Alam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tapsir Alam @ Tapsir @ Jasbin Alam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Ghufran Ansari Vs The State of Bihar And Anr.

Jasim Akhthar @ Jasim Sekh Vs the State of Bihar

Vinod Kumar @ Binod Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dilip Kumar Gupta @ Dilip Kumar Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Habibul Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.