Dismissed

Mantu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC27 Feb 2019CR. MISC./79984/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail matter arising from charges of forgery, fraud, and misappropriation of government funds, the Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's prayer for bail, noting the serious nature of the allegations and directing him to renew the application after one year of custody.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for bail rejected. Petitioner allowed to renew bail prayer after one year in custody.

Mantu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Corruption | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79984 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-719 Year-2018 Thana- SHEKHPURA District- Sheikhpura *

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mantu Kumar, son of Prem Nath @ Kumar Prem Nath, Resident of Village -Sivpur (Chongain), P.S.- Navanagar, District - Buxar, present addressConstable No. 309, Account Section, S.P. Office Sheikhpura, District - Sheikhpura

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manendra Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Reena Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR

¶7

ORAL ORDER

¶8

4 27-02-2019

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶10

Petitioner seeks bail in Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 719/2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66(D) of Information Technology Act.

¶11

Allegation against the petitioner is to have committed forgery, fraud and criminal conspiracy and misappropriated the government money of Rs.50,83,288/- since last several years by transferring the government money in the accounts of other employees and withdrawing the same amount.

¶12

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79984 of 2018(4) dt.27-02-2019 2/2

¶14

02.11.2018.

¶15

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

¶16

However, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after one year in jail custody.

¶17

(S. Kumar, J)

¶18

Sanjay/-

¶19

U T

Mantu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mantu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Brajesh Kumar Singh @ Brajesh Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Akhilesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Shankar Sao @ Shankar Kanu @ Shankar Kandu Vs The State Of Bihar

Sonelal @ Sona Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Guddu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Manoj Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar