Allowed

Guddu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC27 Feb 2019CR. MISC./78707/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Sections 498A and 328 IPC, the Patna High Court allowed the petitioner amidst custody since August 11, 2018, to be released on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties subject to standard cooperation and non-tampering conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount under standard conditions.

Guddu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78707 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-255 Year-2018 Thana- HUSSAINGANJ District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Guddu Singh, Son of Late Patiram Singh R/o village-Habibnagar, P.S.

¶5

-Hussainganj, District-Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Pandey, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sri Rajendra Singh Shastriji (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 27-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶12

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Hussainganj P.S. Case No. 255 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 328, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Allegation against petitioner (husband) including other FIR named accused persons is of trying to kill her by consuming poison for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

¶14

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78707 of 2018(3) dt.27-02-2019 2/3

¶16

that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is in custody since 11.08.2018.

¶17

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Siwan, in connection with Hussainganj P.S. Case No. 255 of 2018, subject to conditions:

¶18

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

¶19

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

¶20

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78707 of 2018(3) dt.27-02-2019 3/3

¶22

cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

¶23

(S. Kumar, J)

¶24

Rajiv/-

¶25

U T

Guddu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Guddu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Brajesh Kumar Singh @ Brajesh Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Akhilesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Shankar Sao @ Shankar Kanu @ Shankar Kandu Vs The State Of Bihar

Sonelal @ Sona Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Manoj Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Mantu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar