Allowed

Ram Chandra Mukhiya and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC3 Apr 2019CR. MISC./79511/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners falsely implicated in an abduction charge. The order stipulated a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties and a 6-week surrender condition, considering the delayed police complaint as a factor.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties of the like amount, subject to surrender within six weeks.

Ram Chandra Mukhiya and Ors. Vs The State Of… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79511 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-289 Year-2018 Thana- SAHEBGANJ District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ram Chandra Mukhiya, S/o Meghu Mukhiya

¶5

Lakhindra Mukhiya S/o Ram Chandra Mukhiya

¶6

Bedamiya Devi W/oRam Chandra Mukhiya

¶7

All are R/vill-Bangra Nizamat,P.S-Sahebganj,Distt.-Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mrs.Jyotsna Rani Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sri Amitesh Kumar

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶16

5 03-04-2019

¶17

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Sahebganj P.S.Case No. 289 of 2018 registered under Sections 323,363,364,365,366A and 504 of the Indian penal Code.

¶18

Allegation as per complaint petition on the basis of which FIR has been lodged is that son of the petitioner no. 1 induced away the daughter of the informant with a purpose to marry her and when he along with others went to them about the same, they threatened him due to which they came back.

¶19

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners are father, brother and mother of the main accused Rajendra Mukhiya as per complaint petition and they have been falsely implicated and the falsity of the case will appear from

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79511 of 2018(5) dt.03-04-2019 2/2

¶21

the fact that complaint petition has been lodged after delay of four months of the occurrence though in her statement recorded Section 164 Cr.PC. victim girl stated that she was kept in the house of the petitioners.

¶22

Heard learned APP also who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail on the ground that there is statement of the girl under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C.

¶23

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, abovenamed, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-1st, Muzaffarpur(West) in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 289 of 2018; subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶24

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶25

sujit/-

¶26

U T

Ram Chandra Mukhiya and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Chandra Mukhiya and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonu @ Tauquir Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Om Prakash Yadav and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Kumar Choubey @ Ashok Choubey and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.

Mithun Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Jaiprakash Sah Nirala Vs The State Of Bihar

Saroj Mahto and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar