Allowed

Mithun Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC3 Apr 2019CR. MISC./6901/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a cheating and criminal conspiracy case where he was implicated only as the son of an accused, subject to bail bond conditions.

What did the court decide?

Application for anticipatory bail allowed; petitioner to be released on bail if arrested/surrender within six weeks, bond Rs. 25,000 plus two sureties of similar amount.

Mithun Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6901 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2018 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mithun Kumar Yadav Son of Shri Satya Narayan Yadav R/o Malahariya, P.S.Baisi, District- Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Bidhu Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ahmad Ali ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 03-04-2019

¶12

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with K. Hat P.S. Case No. 214 of 2018, disclosing offences under Sections 406, 420, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Allegation as per written report is that one Satya Narayan Yadav approached the informant for sell of a piece of land and told him that Yashwardhan Singh will make the agreement and on that the informant has given advance to Yashwardhan Singh and thereafter he told that Yashwardhan Singh could not pay the amount in time due to that agreement be considered as cancelled and thereafter he has taken Rs.23,87,000/-, but thereafter refused to register the sale-deed and it is alleged that in presence of the petitioner and others, the money was given to Satya Narayan Yadav.

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6901 of 2019(3) dt.03-04-2019 2/2

¶15

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that even according to the F.I.R. the allegation is against one Satya Narayan Yadav and Yashwardhan Singh of taking money and not executing the sale-deed and the petitioner has been made accused in this case only because he is the son of Satya Narayan Yadav.

¶16

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶17

Having heard both sides, considering the above submission, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Purnea, in connection with K. Hat P.S. Case No. 214 of 2018, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶18

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶19

Amjad/-

¶20

U T

Mithun Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mithun Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonu @ Tauquir Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Om Prakash Yadav and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Kumar Choubey @ Ashok Choubey and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.

Jaiprakash Sah Nirala Vs The State Of Bihar

Saroj Mahto and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Chandra Mukhiya and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar