The High Court at Patna dismissed the anticipatory bail application as infructuous because the petitioner had already been apprehended, rendering the application no longer necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76376 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2019 Thana- MOHAMMADPUR District- Gopalganj
======================================================
Ram Lal Mahto Son of Gurdeli Mahto Resident of Village- Khaira Azam, Nonia Tola, P.S.- Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhramveer For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Murli Dhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
3 09-12-2019 Today this case has been notified under the heading
“To Be Mentioned” on the motion slip.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been apprehended and as such the application for anticipatory bail has become infructuous.
In view of the above, the present application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
Ravi/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for anticipatory bail has become infructuous since the petitioner has been apprehended.
Ram Lal Mahto
The State of Bihar
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
