Petitioner claimed apprehension of arrest rendering anticipatory bail infructuous. The Court dismissed the application as infructuous.
The application for anticipatory bail is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71206 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-424 Year-2019 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai
======================================================
Kanhaiya Kumar Son of Awadh Singh Resident of Village-Machaha, P.S.Muffasil (Singhaul O.P.), District-Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravindra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Asha Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
2 09-12-2019
Today this case has been notified under the heading
“To Be Mentioned” on the motion slip.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been apprehended and as such the application for anticipatory bail has become infructuous.
In view of the above, the present application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
Ravi/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application persist as the petitioner claims apprehension of arrest.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kanhaiya Kumar and Another
The State of Bihar
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
