Allowed

Rajesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC15 Jan 2019CR. MISC./75603/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail petition arising from a murder charge involving Sections 302/34 IPC and 27 Arms Act, the court granted release to the petitioner on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions regarding appearance and future conduct, notwithstanding the prosecution's objection based on prior charges.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Rajesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.75603 of 2018

¶3

Arising Out of P.S. Case No.-151 Year-2018 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Bhagalpur

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Rajesh Yadav Son of Chusan Yadav, Resident of Village- Baikunthpur, P.S.Sultanganj, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar – 1, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 15-01-2019

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶13

learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶14

Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 27.06.2018 in connection with Sessions Trial No.813 of 2018 arising out of Sultanganj P.S.Case No.151 of 2018 for the offence alleged under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶15

The prosecution case as lodged by the informant is that while he was coming along with his mother and father from the paddy field, 6-7 persons came and stopped them. They started abusing them then the petitioner along with co-accused Bikash Yadav pulled his father from the motorcycle. The allegation upon co-accused Bikash Yadav is that he fired on the informant’s father which did not hit him. Thereafter, the petitioner fired which hit the informant’s father on his waist and

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75603 of 2018(3) dt.15-01-2019 2/3

¶17

again co-accused Bikash Yadav fired on the temporal region which hit the informant’s father who died on the spot. The cause of enmity is property dispute for which earlier also there was some firing against the informant’s father. Altogether four accused are named in the FIR including the petitioner.

¶18

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the aforesaid case. He submits that the main assailant is coaccused Bikash Yadav who fired on the temporal region of the informant’s father and the allegation against the petitioner is of firing on the waist but the postmortem report suggests fire arm injury on the hip. He further submits that the allegation against the petitioner is not of firing on the vital part of the body and undertakes to cooperate in the trial on day to day basis.

¶19

However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail stating therein that the petitioner does not have a clean antecedent as he is involved in one more case of similar nature.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in

¶21

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75603 of 2018(3) dt.15-01-2019 3/3

¶22

connection with Sessions Trial No.813 of 2018 arising out of Sultanganj P.S.Case No.151 of 2018 to the satisfaction of 7^th Additional District & Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur, subject to the following conditions:-

¶23

(i) One of the bailors would be a close relative of the petitioners having sufficient immovable property, who will file an affidavit stating their relationship with the petitioner.

¶24

(ii) Petitioner will appear before the learned court below during trial as and when required and failure to appear on two consecutive dates without assigning any reason will entail cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶25

(iii) If the petitioner indulges in an offence of similar nature in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to move the learned Court below for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶26

(Nilu Agrawal, J)

¶27

B.Kr./-

¶28

Rajesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yawar Ali Rizvi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mukesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Vijay Kumar Singh Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Santosh Mandal and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Seema Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Arun Kumar @ Arun Rai Vs The State Of Bihar