Allowed

Seema Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC15 Jan 2019CR. MISC./1829/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving allegations of keeping and selling illicit liquor. Considering the petitioner's absence of criminal antecedents and undertaking not to tamper with evidence, bail was allowed subject to conditions regarding sureties and appearance in court.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to specific conditions.

Seema Devi Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1829 of 2019

¶3

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-860 Year-2018 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Seema Devi, wife of Amrit Kumar, resident of village- Gopalganj, P.S. Kadirganj, District- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dinesh Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Amrendra Prasad, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 15-01-2019

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶13

learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶14

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nagar

¶15

(Kadirganj) P.S.Case No.860 of 2018 for the offence alleged under Sections 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶16

The prosecution case as lodged by the police personnel is that on secret information that the petitioner has kept illicit liquor in her house and sells them, the police conducted a raid and recovered about 70 liters of foreign liquor from her house. On interrogation, the petitioner submitted that she lives alone in the house.

¶17

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that she is innocent, bear no criminal antecedent and has been falsely implicated. He submits that there is no compliance of Section 100 of the Cr.P.C. as the seizure list was not served on the petitioner which is evident from perusal of the

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1829 of 2019(2) dt.15-01-2019 2/2

¶19

seizure list. Petitioner undertakes not to tamper with the witness and prosecution evidence at any stage whatsoever.

¶20

However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Nagar (Kadirganj) P.S.Case No.860 of 2018 to the satisfaction of ADJ-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Nawada subject to the following conditions:-

¶22

(i) One of the bailors would be a close relative of the petitioner having sufficient immovable property, who will file an affidavit stating their relationship with the petitioners.

¶23

(ii) Petitioner will appear before the learned court below during trial as and when required and failure to appear on two consecutive dates without assigning any reason will entail cancellation of her bail bonds.

¶24

(Nilu Agrawal, J)

¶25

B.Kr./-

¶26

Seema Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Seema Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yawar Ali Rizvi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mukesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Vijay Kumar Singh Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Santosh Mandal and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Arun Kumar @ Arun Rai Vs The State Of Bihar