Allowed

Chuna Choudhary @ Sanjit Kumar Choudhary @ Sanjit Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC12 Mar 2019CR. MISC./73584/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of murder under Sections 302/34 IPC. The Court observed discrepancies regarding the informant's eyewitness status and the specific role of the accused versus another individual, noting the petitioner had already surrendered. Bail was granted subject to conditions regarding a relative surety, court attendance, and cooperation with investigation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, subject to conditions of relative surety, court attendance, and cooperation with investigation.

Chuna Choudhary @ Sanjit Kumar Choudhary @ Sanjit… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73584 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2018 Thana- BAHERA District- Darbhanga

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Chuna Choudhary @ Sanjit Kumar Choudhary @ Sanjit Choudhary Son of Late Trivani Choudhary, Resident of Village- Sajhuwar, Police StationBahera, District- Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nagendra Prasad ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 12-03-2019

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

The petitioner has been in custody since 18.08.2018 in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 184/2018 registered for the offense punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner after drawing the attention of this Court to the F.I.R. submits that admittedly the informant Khagendra Choudhary is not the eye-witness to the occurrence and, therefore, his statement cannot be taken in its entirety. It is further submitted that though he claims to be the grandson of the deceased lady, later on, it has come that he is also not the grandson which is evident from paragraph No. 177 of the case diary. It is thus submitted that so far as the petitioner Chuna Choudhary is concerned, even from the recitals of the F.I.R. it is evident that it was Jhunna Choudhary who had attacked the old lady

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73584 of 2018(4) dt.12-03-2019 2/3

¶16

with a Tengari and not this petitioner who is alleged to have attacked her with fists and slaps. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of such facts and circumstances, the petitioner may be extended the privilege of bail.

¶17

Diary in the present case called for which has since been

¶18

received.

¶19

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State after perusal of the case diary submits that though the informant does not appear to be the eye-witness yet there are other persons who are alleged to have witnessed the occurrence. It appears that the petitioner had not attacked with Tengari but with fists and slaps. Furthermore, it appears that the petitioner has himself surrendered before the Court below.

¶20

Considering the entire facts and circumstances and as informed at the Bar that the charges has already been framed in this case, let the petitioner Chuna Choudhary be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Benipur, Darbhanga, in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 184 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:

¶21

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

¶22

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73584 of 2018(4) dt.12-03-2019 3/3

¶24

offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶25

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

¶26

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶27

(Anjana Mishra, J)

¶28

Saif/-

¶29

U T

Chuna Choudhary @ Sanjit Kumar Choudhary @ Sanjit Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chuna Choudhary @ Sanjit Kumar Choudhary @ Sanjit Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Rajjak and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Gopi Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Vivek Kumar @ Vivek Kumar Singh @ Sonu Vs The State Of Bihar

Indradeo Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Anil Kumar Roy @ Anil Roy Vs The State Of Bihar

Sandeep Singh Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar