Allowed

Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Jul 2019CR. MISC./7314/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a section 498A case. Bail was granted following successful mediation where the dispute was resolved and a payment was made by the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of like amount and adhering to settlement terms.

Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7314 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Chaudhary, Son of Kapil Deo Chaudhary, Resident of Village - Bisaibigha, P.S.- Aungari (O.P.- Pirbigha), DistrictNalanda at present Residing at Quarter No. 1727 Sector- 9D, A-Road, P.O.Sector- 9, P.S.- Haria Steel City Bokaro, District- Bokaro (Jharkhand)

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Puja Kumari, d/o Satendra Kumar, resident of village Harpura, P.O. Mohammadpur, P.S. Vikram, Dist. Patna

¶9

... ... Opposite Parties

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sushil Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey

¶13

======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶15

6 15-07-2019

¶16

Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in

¶17

connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 155 of 2018, corresponding to G.R.No.6894 of 2018, registered for the offences punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶18

Allegation against the petitioner is of demand of Rs.5 lacs and for that he has subjected the informant to cruelty and harassment.

¶19

On appearance of opposite party No.2 the matter was referred to the Mediation Centre vide order dated 4.4.2019 and the Mediator’s report at Flag ‘X’ disclosed that the dispute between the parties has been resolved through the process of

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7314 of 2019(6) dt.15-07-2019 2/3

¶21

mediation as per terms and conditions mutually agreed upon by both the parties and learned counsel for the petitioner has handed over a Bank Draft to learned counsel for opposite party No.2, who in turn has handed over to the opposite party No.2 in Court itself.

¶22

Heard learned APP also.

¶23

In view of above facts and circumstances, let petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the receipt of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/(Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Patna, in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 155 of 2018, corresponding to G.R.No. 6894 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned and further condition is that petitioner has to obey the terms and conditions as mutually agreed upon between the parties and it is expected that opposite party No.2 shall also abide by the terms and conditions of settlement mutually arrived at between the parties.

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7314 of 2019(6) dt.15-07-2019 3/3

¶25

Let the report of Mediator along with the

¶26

memorandum of agreement be sent to the court below for

¶27

needful.

¶28

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶29

spal/-

¶30

U T

Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Islam @ Quazi Md. Islam Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Manjesh Kumar Rai @ Manjesh Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shree Ranjan Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar Yadav and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.

Mustak Ansari Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Saddam Hussain Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.