Petitioner, husband in custody since March 2018 for offences under IPC Sections 306, 307, 498(A) and others, sought bail. Court held insufficient material for regular bail due to husband's implication and factual matrix, dismissing the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72179 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-203 Year-2017 Thana- NAWANAGAR District- Buxar *
======================================================
Satendra Kumar Son of Naga Prasad, Resident of Village-Jamuaw, P.S.-Piro, District-Bhojpur, At Present Address-Bali Mohalla Sonbarsa, P.S.-Nawanagar, District-Buxar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Virendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sakir Ahmad ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER
4 14-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner is the husband who has been in custody since 06.03.2018 in connection with Nawanagar (Sonbarsa) P.S. Case No. 203/2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341/323/306/307/498(A) of the Indian Penal Code. Ultimately, Section 304(B) of the I.P.C. was also added.
Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances and that the petitioner is the husband and also there is sufficient material in the F.I.R. itself to point towards the implication of the petitioner in connection with the aforementioned offence, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to this petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72179 of 2018(4) dt.14-03-2019 2/2
(Anjana Mishra, J)
It is accordingly dismissed.
Saif/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to a husband implicated in an offence under Sections 341, 323, 306, 307, and 498(A) IPC with Section 304(B) added?
Whether the FIR material sufficiently implies the petitioner's involvement in the offence to deny bail?
Satendra Kumar
The State Of Bihar
Anjana Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
