Allowed

Chhateneshwar Prasad Roy v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Nov 2019CR. MISC./71879/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners apprehending arrest in a case involving offences under sections 467, 468, 471, 420, and 34 of the IPC. The bail was subject to furnishing bonds and conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC to be released within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Release on anticipatory bail to be granted if arrested within six weeks by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with one surety.

Chhateneshwar Prasad Roy Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71879 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-263 Year-2016 Thana- BIRAUL District- Darbhanga

¶3

======================================================

¶4

CHHATENESHWAR PRASAD ROY, aged about 35 years, male, Son of Anil Kumar Roy

¶5

Ratneshwar Prasad Roy, aged about 33 years, male, Son of Anil Kumar Roy

¶6

Rajmani Roy @ Rajmani, aged about 30 years, male, Son of Ashok Kumar Roy

¶7

Ram Lal Roy, aged about 44 years, male, Son of Arun Kumar Roy, All Residents of Village - Sonpur, P.S.- Biraul, District- Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sada Nand Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satyavrat Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 19-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶14

APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

The petitioners are the purchaser of Gairmajarua Aam Land as alleged in the First Information Report.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they are innocent and have committed no offence. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Similar situated co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71879 of 2019(3) dt.19-11-2019 2/2

¶19

Court vide order dated 26.11.2016 in Cr. Misc. No.49997 of 2016.

¶20

In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Biraul, District-Darbhanga in connection with Biraul P.S. Case No. 263 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶21

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶22

amitkumar/-

¶23

U T

Chhateneshwar Prasad Roy v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chhateneshwar Prasad Roy v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rinki Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sanowar @ Mulla @ Munahir @ Muwahir Vs The State of Bihar

Prakash Thakur @ Prakash Kumar Thakur @ Abhisekh Kumar Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Hassan Ali Vs The State of Bihar

Biresh Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Rekha Devi Vs The State of Bihar