Allowed

Maya Kumari Singh @ Maya Kumari and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC9 Jan 2019CR. MISC./71141/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order deals with a bail application filed by two petitioners in custody under Sections 420/385/471 IPC and Section 66(C)(E)/67 of the IT Act. After hearing, the Court viewed that investigation was complete and directed their release on bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to be released on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each.

Maya Kumari Singh @ Maya Kumari and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.71141 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-503 Year-2018 Thana- AGAMKUAN District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

1. Maya Kumari Singh @ Maya Kumari, Mobile No. 9397302062, W/o Mithilesh Kumar Singh,

¶5

1. Mithilesh Kumar Singh, S/o Late Rampati Singh, resident of Both Petitioners of Village- Gamhariya, P.S.- Karakat, District- Rohtas. At Present AddressPrasant Nagar, P.S.- Vanasthalipuram, District- Rangareddi, Hyderabad, Telangana.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravi Prakash For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sri Matloob Rab ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶7

5 09-01-2019

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing on behalf of the State as well as informant.

¶9

The petitioners are in custody in connection with Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 503 of 2018 for the offence under Sections 420/385/471 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66 ( C) (E)/67 of I.T. Act.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners are in custody since 13.8.2018 and 09.08.2018 respectively.

¶11

Considering the background that the petitioner and informant were made friend on facebook and thereafter their friendship led to the commission of the present offence of

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.71141 of 2018(5) dt.09-01-2019 2/2

¶13

alleged extortion. The Court is in the fact situation is of the view that when the investigation has been complete in the instant case there is no justification to keep the petitioners in custody. The court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail, let the petitioners named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, I, Patna City, in connection with Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 503 of 2018.

¶14

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶15

T.Kr./-

¶16

U T

Maya Kumari Singh @ Maya Kumari and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maya Kumari Singh @ Maya Kumari and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Managing Committee Of Madrasa Darul Hoda Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Suresh Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar, Through Mr. Shri Khalid Mirza, Director Higher Education, Govt. Of Bihar and Or

Prof. Bharat Lal Jha Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary, Higher Education, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Shamima Khatoon @ Farjana Khatoon Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ajay Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Umesh Ray Vs The State Of Bihar