Allowed

Uday Shankar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC14 Feb 2019CR. MISC./70703/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In bail proceedings arising from a criminal case involving IPC and Bihar Wine Prohibition Act provisions, the Patna High Court directed the enlargement of the petitioner on bail after noting that a co-accused in identical circumstances had already been granted bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Uday Shankar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.70703 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2018 Thana- DEODHA District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Uday Shankar Yadav, Son of Majilal Yadav @ Mejlal Yadav, resident of Village- Gadha, P.S. Deodha, District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bimal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sri Prem Kumar Jha ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 14-02-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶12

counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶13

The petitioner is in custody since 23.09.2018 in connection with Deodha P.S. Case No.112 of 2018 (G.R.No.1391 of 2018), registered under Sections 341, 323, 386, 379, 504, 290, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 37(C) of Bihar Wine Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the allegation levelled against the petitioner is of having demand of Rangdari, in fact the allegation of having been in drunken stage stands also against one co-accused, namely, Atabul Rain who has since been granted regular bail in Cr. Misc. No.71155 of 2018 vide order dated 04.12.2018.

¶15

In view of the aforementioned facts and

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.70703 of 2018(4) dt.14-02-2019 2/2

¶17

circumstances of the case and similarly situated co-accused has been granted privilege of bail, let the petitioner, Uday Shankar Yadav, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 2^nd Addl. District & Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Madhubani, in connection with Deodha P.S. Case No.112 of 2018 (G.R.No.1391 of 2018)

¶18

(Anjana Mishra, J)

¶19

sanjeev/-

¶20

U T

Uday Shankar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uday Shankar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kunal Kumar @ Dharm Kumar Yadav @ Dharam Kujal Yadav @ Dharam Kunal Yadav Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Arun Singh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Akhilesh Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Harendra Paswan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Kumodi Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajesh Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar