In this criminal miscellaneous appeal, the High Court of Patna dismissed the petition. The bench held that there were no cogent reasons to interfere with the impugned order and thus the matter was disposed of without engaging other issues.
The petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.69647 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1307 Year-2017 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGaya
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amarendra Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as
learned APP.
Gone through the order impugned inconsonance with the allegation as well as averments whatever been made in the petition. There happens to be no cogent reason to interfere with the order impugned.
Petition is dismissed.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)
Prakash Narayan U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can interfere with the order impugned in the absence of cogent reasons.
Vikash Kumar
Vivek Kumar
The State Of Bihar
Navin Kumar Sinha
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
