Raghunandan Sao v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court heard the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail in a case alleging defalcation of paddy under the IPC. The court found the petitioner not entitled to bail and rejected the prayer.
What did the court decide?
The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69045 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2019 Thana- THARTHARI District- Nalanda
======================================================
RAGHUNANDAN SAO, Aged about 60 years, Male, Son of Late Daroga Sao, Resident of Dak Bunglow Road, Parwalpur, P.O, Police StationParwalpur, District-Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
- Versus
- The State of Bihar.
- Ranjeet Kumar, Son of Suresh Prasad, Resident of Village-Kuttupur, P.O.Chiraili, P.S.-Khizersarai, District-Gaya, Presently posted as Block Cooperative Extension Officer, Tharthari, P.S.-Tharthari, District-Nalanda.
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Parmeshwar Mehta ======================================================
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can be granted anticipatory bail in a criminal case alleging defalcation of paddy.
Whether the petitioner being accused of sale of paddy in the open market and defalcation is entitled to anticipatory bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAGHUNANDAN SAO
- respondent
The State of Bihar
- respondent
Ranjeet Kumar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court