Allowed

Rajiv Ranjan Singh @ Bablu v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Nov 2019CR. MISC./68706/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted an application for bail to the petitioner in a police complaint case registered under Section 498(A) IPC arising from PS Case No. 1078 of 2008 at Gaya. The petitioner, held in custody since July 2, 2019, was released on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 along with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Gaya.

Rajiv Ranjan Singh @ Bablu Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68706 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1078 Year-2008 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rajiv Ranjan Singh @ Bablu Son of Mohan Singh Resident of VillageJamuara, P.S.- Tekari, District- Gaya.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

Kumari Shobha Wife of Rajiv Ranjan Singh, Daughter of Krishna Singh Resident of Village- Jamuar, Police Station - Tekari, District- Gaya, At present resident of Mohalla- Pirachak, P.S.- Paraiya, District- Gaya

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No2, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 06-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶15

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶16

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 1078 of 2008, registered for offence punishable under Sections 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

¶18

submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Further submission is that the allegation levelled against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 02.07.2019.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68706 of 2019(2) dt.06-11-2019 2/2

¶21

and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, let the above-named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 1078 of 2008.

¶22

(Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶23

S.Katyayan/-

¶24

U T

Rajiv Ranjan Singh @ Bablu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajiv Ranjan Singh @ Bablu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Wahid Vs The State of Bihar

Mahfuz Alam @ Mahfuj Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Kumar Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Golu Singh @ Mukesh Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Munni Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar

Kamlesh Mali @ Kamlesh Kumar Mali Vs The State of Bihar