A criminal/miscellaneous application for bail was allowed to be withdrawn by the court after being deemed infructuous due to a prior bail application and arrest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66866 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2018 Thana- KATIHAR MUFFASIL District- Katihar
======================================================
MD. ZAMIL @ MD. ZAMIL AKHTAR S/o Md. Rahul R/o villageMakhdumpur, P.S.- Katihar (Muffassil), District- Katihar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravi Shanker Pankaj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
2 23-10-2019
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner
has submitted that petitioner has been arrested and he has already applied for grant of regular bail, as such, this application has become infructuous and he may be permitted to withdraw the same.
Permission is accorded.
This application is accordingly dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)
sunilkumar/-
U T
Md. Zamil @ Md. Zamil Akhtar
The State of Bihar
Vinod Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
