Partly allowed

Dinesh Kumar Rai @ Dinesh Rai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Nov 2019CR. MISC./66508/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna permitted withdrawal of anticipatory bail against petitioner no. 1. It granted anticipatory bail to petitioner no. 2 apprehending arrest in a criminal case involving assault and other offences, subject to conditions including bail bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail petition against petitioner no. 1 withdrawn and dismissed. Anticipatory bail granted to petitioner no. 2 subject to surrender within six weeks, bail bond conditions, and specific und

Dinesh Kumar Rai @ Dinesh Rai Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66508 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-237 Year-2019 Thana- PATORI District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

DINESH KUMAR RAI @ DINESH RAI Son of Shri Devi Prasad Rai Resident of Village- Hawaspur, P.S.- Patory, District- Samastipur.

¶5

Yashwant Kumar Rai @ Yashwant Kumar Son of Shri Devi Prasad Rai Resident of Village- Hawaspur, P.S.- Patory, District- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bijay Bhushan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 06-11-2019

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioners Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad states that the petitioner no. 1 already been arrested and seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition as against him, as the same has become infructuous.

¶15

Permission is accorded. Anticipatory bail petition as against petitioner no. 1, is permitted to be withdrawn and is dismissed as such.

¶16

The petitioner no. 2 apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 447, 323, 307, 324, 504, 506, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Shahpur Patori P.S. Case No. 237 of 2019.

¶17

It is submitted that the petitioner no. 2 has been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute and the informant is none other than the nephew of the petitioner no. 2. There is case and counter case between the parties. The petitioner no. 2 along with coaccused Ankush Kumar are alleged to have assaulted the informant with iron rod on his head, but in any event the injuries are simple in nature. The petitioner no. 2 claims clean antecedents.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66508 of 2019(2) dt.06-11-2019 2/2

¶19

Learned APP assisted by learned counsel for the informant appears and has been heard.

¶20

Be that as it may, in the event of arrest or surrender by petitioner no. 2 before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner no. 2 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM IV, Samastipur, in connection with Shahpur Patori P.S. Case No. 237 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

¶21

i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner no. 2.

¶22

ii. That the petitioner no. 2 shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶23

iii. That the petitioner no. 2 shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶24

iv. The petitioner no. 2 shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶25

Chandran/-

¶26

U T

Dinesh Kumar Rai @ Dinesh Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Kumar Rai @ Dinesh Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parmeshwar Rajwar Vs The State of Bihar

Alok Tiwari @ Alok Vs The State of Bihar

Asaru @ Tajemul Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Sah @ Rakesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Angad Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Shashi Shekhar @ Shashi Das Vs The State of Bihar