This Court rejected a renewed bail prayer in a criminal case involving murder and rioting charges, noting that nine prosecution witnesses were already examined. The court observed that the trial should be concluded expeditiously within three months.
Bail prayer dismissed; order that trial shall be concluded within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65232 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2016 Thana- SANHAULA DistrictBhagalpur
======================================================
RAKESH SAH @ RAKESH KUMAR Son of Suresh Sah Resident of Village - Nayagaon Shyampur, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Munger
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Nalin Vilochan Tiwary, Advocate. For the Informant : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 06-11-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned
counsel for the informant as well as learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65232 of 2019(2) dt.06-11-2019 2/2
(Vikash Jain, J)
Ibrar//-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail at the stage when most prosecution witnesses have been examined.
Whether the trial court has concluded the trial within the mandated expedited timeline.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rakesh Sah
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
