Allowed

Srikant Prasad @ Chirkut Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Dec 2019CR. MISC./65915/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to nine petitioners in a criminal case involving assault, injury, and arms possession. The High Court allowed the application subject to a bail bond and surrender within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners granted anticipatory bail, to be released upon arrest/surrender within six weeks on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties.

Srikant Prasad @ Chirkut Prasad Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65915 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2016 Thana- PAKRIDAYAL District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SRIKANT PRASAD @ CHIRKUT PRASAD Son of Ram Prasad Sah Resident of Village and P.S.- Pakridayal, District - East Champaran

¶5

Anil Sah Son of Ram Prasad Sah Resident of Village and P.S.- Pakridayal, District - East Champaran

¶6

Binod Sah Son of Ram Prasad Sah Resident of Village and P.S.- Pakridayal, District - East Champaran

¶7

Narayan Sah Son of Ram Prasad Sah Resident of Village and P.S.Pakridayal, District - East Champaran

¶8

Kishun Sah @ Krishna Prasad Son of Gopal Sah Resident of Village and P.S.- Pakridayal, District - East Champaran

¶9

Birendra Sah Son of Horil Prasad Resident of Village and P.S.- Pakridayal, District - East Champaran

¶10

Upendra Sah @ Lalu Son of Mangal Sah Resident of Village and P.S.Pakridayal, District - East Champaran

¶11

Ramchandra Sah Son of Jagdish Prasad Resident of Village and P.S.Pakridayal, District - East Champaran

¶12

Mishrilal Sah Son of Rambriksha Prasad Resident of Village and P.S.Pakridayal, District - East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶17

======================================================

¶18

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amarendra Nath Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dr. Ajeet Kumar

¶19

======================================================

¶20

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶21

3 18-12-2019 This application, for grant of anticipatory bail,

¶22

arises out of Pakridayal P.S. Case No. 4 of 2016, disclosing offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379, 448, 504, 506, 426 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65915 of 2019(3) dt.18-12-2019 2/2

¶24

Allegation against the petitioners is of assault to the son of informant.

¶25

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that no specific allegation has been attributed to the petitioner and injury is simple in nature.

¶26

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶27

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-V, Motihari, East Champarna, in connection with Pakridayal P.S. Case No. 4 of 2016, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶28

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶29

sunilkumar/-

¶30

U T

Srikant Prasad @ Chirkut Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Srikant Prasad @ Chirkut Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nanki Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Surendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Shahajahan Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar

Gopi Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Akash Mahto @ Vivek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Satyam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar