Allowed

Dhaneshwar Pandit v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Dec 2019CR. MISC./65509/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a kidnapping case under Section 366-A IPC, directing a bond of Rs.20,000 with sureties and conditions regarding surety residence and cooperation with trial.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties of like amount, subject to conditions of residence and cooperation with trial.

Dhaneshwar Pandit Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65509 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2019 Thana- SINGHIYA District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

DHANESHWAR PANDIT Son of Vindeshwar Pandit @ Bindeshwar Pandit Resident of Village-Pate Belahi, P.S-Singhiya, P.O-Singhiya, DistrictSamastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

THE STATE OF BIHAR ====================	... ... Opposite Party/s ==================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :	Mr.Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, Adv
For the State : ====================	Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP ==================================
CORAM: HONOURABL	E MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR

¶7

ORAL ORDER

¶8

4 13-12-2019

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶10

learned APP for the State.

¶11

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

According to FIR, the informant saw that four person including the petitioner on the point of pistol, kidnapped to his minor sister at about 2.00 P.M. on 12.02.2019. Even after seeing the actual occurrence of kidnapping, the informant lodged the FIR on 23.02.2019 i.e. after ten days of the occurrence. The Supervising Authority has found allegation against co-accused-Shiv Kumar and Raj Kishore Sharma as not participant of the occurrence as reported by the witnesses. Chargesheet has already been submitted against the petitioner and the investigation is pending against those accused. The

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65509 of 2019(4) dt.13-12-2019 2/2

¶14

report of the S.P. of the district in the matter of reason for nonrecovery of the victim just shows steps taken by the I.O. in this regard which is not satisfactory.

¶15

Submission is that the matter is of love affairs and the victim has eloped with co-accused-Birendra Sharma. However, in a planned manner, the petitioner has been implicated in this case. Petitioner is in custody since 29.06.2019. Investigation of the case against the petitioner is already complete.

¶16

Considering the entire facts aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Singhiya Police Station Case No.22 of 2019, subject to the condition that both bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and further the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶17

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶18

Nitesh/- U T

Dhaneshwar Pandit v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhaneshwar Pandit v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saryug Tanti Vs The State of Bihar

Jaipal Alias @ Ram Jaipal Rai @ Jaipal Singh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Anup Kumar @ Anu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sudhir Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sadhu Rai @ Sadhu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ramjee Yadav Vs The State of Bihar