Allowed

Jaipal Alias @ Ram Jaipal Rai @ Jaipal Singh Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Dec 2019CR. MISC./79699/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

, The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners apprehending arrest for liquor sale and purchase offences. No direct evidence against them; released on condition to cooperate with investigation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on anticipatory bail via bail bond of Rs.20,000 each with two sureties, conditioned on cooperation.

Jaipal Alias @ Ram Jaipal Rai @ Jaipal Singh Yadav Vs The… — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79699 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-346 Year-2019 Thana- BARH District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Jaipal Alias @ Ram Jaipal Rai @ Jaipal Singh Yadav S/o Late Bhuna Rai R/o village- Pachhiyari Malahi, P.S.- Barh, District- Patna

¶5

Shravan Kumar S/o Jaipal Rai R/o village- Pachhiyari Malahi, P.S.- Barh, District- Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kalyan Shankar, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 10-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 38 and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶14

Submission is that recovery of liquor is alleged from the house of some other persons and they disclosed that coaccused Nitish Kumar was involved in sale and purchase of the liquor at a belated stage of the investigation and some one stated to the police that the petitioners were also involved in the same business.

¶15

Considering the fact that there is no direct material

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79699 of 2019(3) dt.10-12-2019 2/2

¶17

against the petitioners and also considering that the petitioners have got clean antecedent, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise, Patna in connection with Barh P.S.Case No.346 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as well as condition that the petitioners shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners.

¶18

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶19

B.Kr./-

¶20

U T

Jaipal Alias @ Ram Jaipal Rai @ Jaipal Singh Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jaipal Alias @ Ram Jaipal Rai @ Jaipal Singh Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sunna @ Jhunna @ Jitendra Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Harendra Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Saryug Tanti Vs The State of Bihar

Anup Kumar @ Anu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Gobinda Kumar @ Gobinda Kumar Paswan @ Govind Kumar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar