The Patna High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail petition filed by Kirani Prasad. The court held the petition was not maintainable noting the complaint was old (2009) and process concluded with the petitioner declared as an absconder.
The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed as not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63519 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-435 Year-2009 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGaya
======================================================
KIRANI PRASAD Son of Mahadeo Sao Resident of Village- Sobh, P.S.Barachatti, District- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 22-10-2019
The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 323, 379, 304 and 295 IPC registered in connection with Complaint Case No. 435/2009, Tr. No. 1091/2018.
heard.
Chandran/-
(Vikash Jain, J)
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner apprehending arrest under sections 323, 379, 304 and 295 IPC is maintainable in light of the complaint being filed in 2009 and the petiti
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Kirani Prasad
The State of Bihar
Raghuwar Prasad Sinha
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
